There is zero need for motorcycles. Yet, you have one. There is zero need for a car with more than four cylinders that can go faster than 60mph. Yet, there they are, all over the place. The world where you only have things you need is a rather drab place.I have a gun or few, but there is absolutely zero need for auto or semi-auto assault rifles.
You should also speak for yourself rather than presuming to speak for everyone. If you don't need one, that does not at all mean that nobody needs one.
Now that we're done with the silly "need" stuff, here are a couple of facts:
1. There is no such thing as a "semi-auto assault rifle". Assault rifles are select-fire by definition. There are guns that look like assault rifles, but function same as any other semi-auto.
2. Select-fire and full-auto firearms are tightly regulated. Since the Prohibition they have been used in crime twice, one of which was a murder committed by a police officer.
There is more to hunting than just deer. AR-style rifles are not typically used for deer, but are widely used for varminting and pest control.Some people claim these are for "hunting". If you can't hit a deer in the first shot, you need more practice.
That I can agree with.Yes, they are fricking fun.
Actually, they don't. Semi-auto rifles figure in a very small percentage of widely publicized shootings.But these crazy people can get ahold of them and lay waste to lots of innocent people. There would be many less dead in Aurora, CO if Joe Crazy had a much harder time getting his hands on them.
Some of the bloodiest mass murders have been committed with no guns at all. Korea has strict gun control. Yet, a nutcase killed 198 (that's one hundred ninety eight) and injured 147 people with nothing more than two milk cartons full of gasoline. It's known as the Daegu Subway Fire.
What do you think the death toll would have been if this guy chained the doors, sprayed the theater with gas and set it on fire?
You are awfully confident in your marksmanship under stress. Try shooting under mild stress, such as a timer. Your confidence might suffer.As for home and family protection, 5 rounds out of a .38 would take care of 5 invaders in my home in 5 seconds, though that will never happen.
Also, I somehow doubt that if the Korean shopkeepers during the LA riots were armed with 5-shot revolvers rather than AR rifles their shops would have fared quite aswell as they did.
In other words, you don't have any interest in the matter. Why do you make such weighty pronouncements? You are probably lucky to live someplace safe. Not everybody is lucky that way. There are people that, for instance, deliver pizza in the inner cities for a living.My guns were all inherited from my father. Otherwise, I'd have none.
And on several occasions, they have. Appalachian School of Law, New Life Church, to name a couple.I'm completely for permitted concealed carry. These are the guys that could stop a Joe Crazy before he could kill many.
You say that like it's a good thing.As far as the "You cain't take away my freedom!" set, there are speed limits and stop signs and laws of all kinds everywhere you look.
Don't get me wrong, I don't think traffic rules are bad. I do think control of everything for the sake of control is simply awful. Many of these "laws of all kinds" are just senseless.
There was no Internet when the Constitution was written, either. Does freedom of speech only apply to spoken word and writing with a quill?If cars had been invented when the Constitution was written, there would be a "freedom of speed" amendment. But the cars then would be about as advanced as the firearms were then (like semi portable single-shot, takes 2 minutes to reload...), and would probably max out at about 15mph, which couldn't really do all that much damage going as fast as they could. But cars got faster and laws were needed. Guns got faster and laws are needed.